Board Thread:Mortal Kombat (Alternate Timeline)/@comment-27844144-20160627000524/@comment-4565921-20160914042823

Dragonspyne wrote: @Riley: I don't disagree with any of your points to my counterpoints. Yes, Hannibal isn't as skilled of a fighter and he is also not a really good choice for the next guest character. However, they could do worse like Chucky.

@Fireworks: Mokap and Stryker. Both human and both without powers. I will give you the fact that they're both young. And, again, I agree that Hannibal doesn't belong in MK.

@Dynamo: Well said. People both need to understand that and sometimes have to be reminded of that. It's weird when someone says they're non-canon all the time or when people assume that something is canon. They clearly don't fully understand MK arcade endings. Regarding Riley's post, I doubt that Chucky will be in an MK game. To some degree, he would be the opposite of Motaro. What I mean is that he's so small, and it would be hard to grab him.

About arcade endings, while they're never meant to be canon, they can just borrow elements from them. One example could be in Johnny Cage's MKX ending, where he finds that book about Edenian long life.