Talk:Daegon/Current Timeline/@comment-27890048-20160303191409/@comment-55227-20160304203920

The majority of your contributions are actually still there. Riley mostly removed the references; and even those aren't a large concern, as a simple tag would have fixed the coding issue. Whenever references are cited, that tag must be present. If it isn't, put it in its own section at the bottom of the page, marked References.

The heated argument over this ends here. Any questions or comments will be directed to me.

What Riley is trying to tell you is what you have posted on this page already exists on the original timeline page. This page only exists to mark where the story diverges from the original timeline; there isn't really a need to have it on both timeline pages. If there is new information that takes place before the two timelines diverge, then it would actually go on the original timeline page, with maybe a note here on this page.