Board Thread:Mortal Kombat X/@comment-4222221-20140620142209/@comment-25100715-20140727131152

Yellow Ledbetter wrote: JillKill87 wrote: Yellow Ledbetter wrote: Shao Kahn winning and Armageddon prevented like Kahn was the ultimate menace, makes no sense. This would make all MK:A Konquest non canon. no shit lol. Armageddon could only be "prevented" if the brothers won, the power goes through their armor deciding an outcome of either death or, what most though, stripping of powers/making them stronger. If someone with no Armor kills Blaze they get his power, and right from the horses Mouth Vogal said up there Kahn killed Blaze, thus he got the power, thus "causing" armageddon

Vogals the main writer people he can change it around if he wants too. it made for a better story to have Kahn win, so thats what he did, get over it guys. Straight from his mouth he said Kahn won, not killed Blaze. As writer, he can also change it, and this omission on his words is open for speculation.

On Taven's ending, Armageddon was not prevented, his victory changed nothing, so all kombatants kept fighting.

Ridley said enough, there's no way to measure a good story, and a major change like this is unecessary and confusing, if truth. Yeah, he is legitimate to change everything, but it does not mean that it's coherent and as I said before, his omissions are widely open for speculation. Its not open to speculation, you see it int he beginning of MK 9, hes glowing orange and there is an orange flaming tornado behind him, definitely from blazes death and kahn then glows orange. this isnt some theory still with angles, sorry if you dont like what he did but its set in stone, kahn killed blaze, caused Armageddon, and ended that timeline.

and no, not just won, hes says kills, are you not reading the most important part of the question? christ the people ask him exactly what your questioning, who defeated blaze ill show you again:

..........who has *****"defeated"***** Blaze in the MKA?

@ CrimsonSumac ... In Armageddon we wanted it to be Taven. But in MK9 it turns out to be Shao Kahn.

"It's no matter of "getting over" [insert Scorpion joke here], there's a lot of darkness on this possible changes, Armageddon's ending wasn't well explained, and to continue we must keep coherence. Even MK:D's Konquest mode needs coherence."

it got explained in the following game, there is nothing left to explain, you arguing about what Vogal said is the equivilent of me arguing about what Tolkien wrote about Gandalf and Saruman being angelic beings not just wizards. Ill say it again hes the writer he says it, its set in stone, its not our story, its his.

plus lets be honest, it paved the way for the best MK we ever got so if it means messing with the story of a single game to do that then im down for it lol