Board Thread:Mortal Kombat X/@comment-4222221-20140620142209/@comment-4809082-20140727005956

JillKill87 wrote: Yellow Ledbetter wrote: Shao Kahn winning and Armageddon prevented like Kahn was the ultimate menace, makes no sense. This would make all MK:A Konquest non canon. no shit lol. Armageddon could only be "prevented" if the brothers won, the power goes through their armor deciding an outcome of either death or, what most though, stripping of powers/making them stronger. If someone with no Armor kills Blaze they get his power, and right from the horses Mouth Vogal said up there Kahn killed Blaze, thus he got the power, thus "causing" armageddon

Vogals the main writer people he can change it around if he wants too. it made for a better story to have Kahn win, so thats what he did, get over it guys. Straight from his mouth he said Kahn won, not killed Blaze. As writer, he can also change it, and this omission on his words is open for speculation.

On Taven's ending, Armageddon was not prevented, his victory changed nothing, so all kombatants kept fighting.

Ridley said enough, there's no way to measure a good story, and a major change like this is unecessary and confusing, if truth. Yeah, he is legitimate to change everything, but it does not mean that it's coherent and as I said before, his omissions are widely open for speculation.

It's no matter of "getting over" [insert Scorpion joke here], there's a lot of darkness on this possible changes, Armageddon's ending wasn't well explained, and to continue we must keep coherence. Even MK:D's Konquest mode needs coherence.