Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-109.226.59.50-20131003145921

I find something unsatisfactory in the claim that Noob Saibot was introduced in MK1, while Sub-Zero was introduced in MK2. Even if some versions of the story later decided that they are the same perdona, and even though these version are currently considered canonical - this presentation is just confusing to anyone coming to the wiki for basic information.

There is no character called Noob Saibot in MK1, but there is a character called Sub-Zero. Even though they are later discovered to be different characters, the MK1 and MK2 Sub-Zero share the same name, appearance and moves. Noob Saibot is totally different.

I think it would be better if the tables are reversed, and Sub-Zero is mentioned in MK1, Noob in MK2. The background explaining the relationship between Noob, the first Sub-Zero and the second Sub-Zero should be kept, for anyone looking for deeper information. But the basic information should refer to what is visible on the surface. 