Talk:Chris Alexander/@comment-69.135.167.197-20160109201137/@comment-809585-20160110224147

There's a major difference between misconception and a rumour, you're making it seem like the anon intentionally did it to spite you. There was literally no need for the response you gave, it would've been much easier to explain to him that it's common misconception Daniel was fired instead of literally screaming at him to get his facts straight.

You're also acting quite confident that the anon knew it was mere bullshit and said it with the malicious intent on being an anonymous user just to add more to it. Really it would've been better if (as I said) you just explained instead of shitting on them.